Sunday, March 17, 2019
The Real Plague :: essays research papers
The Real blightAlthough never given permission to kill, by super inborn or natural means, man has reserved for himself the regenerate to kill other manpower. This self-imposed right has been put into enjoy manpowert in our civilizations and countries. Whether train of logic is offered or not, mutilate is very difficult to justify. As existentialists study, "honesty with oneself" cannot be compromised in every shape or form. Why, then, does man murder? Perhaps man tries to use the excuse of good intentions to escape the responsibility for his actions. In Camus, The Plague, Jean Tarrou dares to go against the idea of men having the right to kill other men. He represents a small part of the general public, in both the novel and in real life. While most of the character development is based on the direct conflict with the physical pestilence, Tarrou takes on a more mesomorphic symbol of plague as well as this corporeal pestiferous his goal is not only of combating the p lague which physically robs men of life, alone to suppress the plague which ravages mens hearts, specially his own. To start a task force, one needs people. When Rieux and Tarrou converse, they discuss who to put into the task force. Rieux suggests that maybe Jean should consider using some of the prisoners in the jail to utilization against the plague. After dealing with plague-stricken men all his life, Tarrou rejects this proposal. Tarrou comments, "I loathe mens being condemned to death," (125). Tarrous reasoning for that not wanting prisoners to be used deviates from the ordinary. While many would object to prisoners being sent taboo to work because they do not deserve to be set free. Tarrou has opposite reasons. Because the plague is equal to death, Tarrou would want no part in forcing men to take part in. He wants volunteers, "free men,"(124) to confront death, not move individuals. This reveals an important belief of his of man is to confront death, it should be by his own desires and choices, not by something which "fancies it knows everything and therefore claims for itself the right to kill," (131). Many people would believe that the prisoners deserve to die. After all, these men are the worst mankind has to offer, and the earthly concern may even be a better place without them. This is the type of rationale one uses to assume he "knows everything.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment